Hand-Picked Daily GUN DEALS

Oregon Court Upholds Mag Ban & Purchase Permits

An Oregon Appeals Court ruled that magazine bans and purchase permits do not violate residents' Second Amendment rights.

Author Bio Image for Jacki Billings - Editor-in-Chief
By
Jacki Billings (Editor-in-Chief)

PPT Editor-in-Chief. Professional journalist 15+ years. NRA & BLS instructor. 2000+ articles

Published Mar 15, 2025
Add as preferred source on Google

We review products independently. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn a commission to help support our testing. Learn more.

The Oregon Court of Appeals ruled that a measure placing further restrictions on firearm and ammo purchases in Oregon does not violate the state’s constitution.

Ballot Measure 114 prohibits large-capacity magazines over 10 rounds and mandates that residents hold a permit before buying a gun. To obtain the permit, residents have to pass a criminal background check and successfully pass a gun safety course. Additionally, it closes the so-called “Charleston Loophole” which allows firearm transfers to move forward if a background check takes longer than three days.

Loaded AR-15 Magazines

Despite a narrowly passing by voters, Measure 114 drew the ire of pro-2A advocates who said that the ban and further regulations were unconstitutional.

“Despite where you stand on Second Amendment issues, consider this: Oregon already has some of the strongest gun laws in the country. The problem is they aren’t enforced, and Measure 114 does nothing but create new bureaucratic barriers to responsible gun ownership. It does not address the problem: enforcement of existing laws and access to mental health services,” Oregon Gun Owners said in a statement.

“Measure 114 targets the wrong people. Elected leaders must step up to address the root causes of crime. Complicated issues like this should not be legislated from the ballot box.”

AR-15-Smith-&-Wesson-Sport-I-EOTech-EXPS-3-Rail-Scales-Spray-Painted-Camo-Magpul

Initially, an Eastern Oregon judge agreed, saying that Measure 114 violated the Second Amendment; however, that decision was overturned by a three-judge panel Court of Appeals. In a 25-page opinion, the panel argued Harney County Circuit Court Judge Robert Raschio applied the wrong legal framework when deeming the measure unconstitutional.

“We conclude that all of Measure 114 is facially constitutional,” the court wrote.

Backers of the bill said the appeals court decision was a welcomed win in the fight against gun violence.

Shellshock Protection mk18 huxwrx 556k flow sig sauer p365 X Macro comp romeo eclipse exo pro eotech magnifier surefire m340 dft turbo

“Oregonians brought this measure to the ballot,” Jess Marks, executive director for the Alliance for a Safe Oregon, said during a conference.

“They passed it, and it’s the gun lobby that has brought these lawsuits forward. We intend, in partnership with all the folks who’ve worked on this issue, to see Oregonians' wishes through.”

Voters passed the bill in 2022 with a 50.6% majority vote.

AR-15 Magazines mags ar15 .223 5.56 556 pmag lancer magpul

Though the Court of Appeals agreed to allow the measure to continue forward, it won’t go into effect immediately. Opponents of the bill will have 35 days to appeal. Lead counsel in opposition of the bill said they intend to do just that.

“Today Measure 114 has turned millions of Oregonians into criminals because their right to bear arms has been erased by Oregon’s Judiciary,” lead counsel Tony Aiello, Jr. told Oregon Public Broadcasting in a statement.

“We intend to appeal this ruling to the Oregon Supreme Court and call on Oregonians for their continued support of this litigation.”

What are your thoughts on the appeals court decision? Let us know in the comments below. For more on what’s happening in the gun world, check out our News page.

Jacki Billings

Written By
Jacki Billings
Editor-in-Chief

Jacki Billings delved into the world of guns while earning her black belt in Yongmudo. Armed with a degree in journalism, she’s penned thousands of articles for the gun industry. She’s passionate about self-defense and first aid and sharing what works (and what doesn’t) with readers. Jacki currently serves as Pew Pew Tactical's Editor-in-Chief directing coverage and managing the content and video teams as well as fact checking all articles.

facebook Iconinstagram Iconlinkedin Icon

WHY YOU CAN TRUST PEW PEW TACTICAL

Since 2016, the Pew Pew Tactical team has been dedicated to providing expert reviews and in-depth testing of guns and gear. All while keeping in mind that guns are fun and that readers come first.

Written by American gun enthusiasts, competitive shooters, former military/law enforcement personnel, and trained journalists, we use our extensive skill sets and knowledge to bring a well-rounded, researched approach to our content.

We pride ourselves on hands-on testing and real-world experience with all products we recommend. Further, we believe in objectivity and approaching all articles without bias – our few advertisers never influence our reviews or recommendations. We believe in giving our readers a comprehensive understanding of how and why a product is great – or isn’t. And if it’s good enough for us to use ourselves and recommend to loved ones.

Our content, analysis, and insights on firearms and gear are recognized across the web. We are proud to be cited by authoritative third-party platforms including Newsweek, Yahoo News, and Wikipedia, demonstrating our standing as a trusted resource in the firearms industry.

Conversation